Your child brings home
His Love.
Exposing
Layers of bigotry
Caste
Language
Class
Nationality
Colour
Religion
Gender
Why must it be so?
When Love is Love.
Your child brings home
His Love.
Exposing
Layers of bigotry
Caste
Language
Class
Nationality
Colour
Religion
Gender
Why must it be so?
When Love is Love.
How I long to run
trailing behind me. Unsure
of its place. Flailing
but not giving up.
I don’t care much about
the kite. I want to feel the wind
in my hair. The hill
I must climb. The view
from the summit. My town
lying still at my feet. I run
My kite runs with me. Red
like my menstrual blood.
Powerful. It finds a current
and climbs up. Steadily.
Strongly. Purposefully.
It tugs hard.
It rises high. I struggle
to keep up. One day
I too will be Free
“You are a girl. It’s easy for you”, is something every woman who is or aspires to be professionally qualified hears. I heard it too.
“You are a girl, you will get into IIM. We are the ones who have to struggle.”
Well, guess what. Standardized Aptitude Tests aren’t (to the best of my knowledge) calibrated to recognise gender. And someone who’s been on the high school and University debating team has a distinct advantage over the others in GDs and interviews.
Less than a year later, it was back.
“Girls always get summer placement in the first weekend itself.”
Some did. But most of us had to wait, and during every one of those five weeks when others were getting placed, we were constantly reminded of how it is easy for girls.
“Girls get Day Zero placements even if they aren’t I-Schols.”
By then, the statement had almost stopped hurting. But we saw a new aspect of discrimination. After clearing multiple rounds of interviews, when I finally made it to the last interview of my Dream Job, the question came, “what would you do if your child falls ill on a day when you have an important presentation." I fumbled and was out. Why are men never asked that question. Do they not marry or have kids?
The statements never end:“You are a girl. You will get a cushy department.”
“You are a girl. You will get promoted before us.”
“You are a girl. Nobody will question if you leave early.”
That cushy department was a 6 month deputation where I was the sole occupant of the company guest house. The promotion almost never came because a boss had messed up my appraisal. I did leave earlier than the others, but also checked in long before they did.
Women balanced greater expectations at home, with demands of the workplace. Women missed out on informal networking opportunities because they weren’t a part of the Boys Gang. Women struggled to find washrooms when they had to travel. Women took on the tougher assignments because to refuse would have meant being branded weak.
Women learnt to ignore misogynistic remarks. Women pretended not to notice the condescending manner in which they were treated. Women accepted the fact that they would find it much more difficult to be heard and taken seriously.
Worst of all, women learnt to shoulder the burden of the gender. When a man made a mistake, it was a mere stumble. When a woman made the same mistake, the entire gender got branded.
And yet, when a women says 'every woman I meet at the top position is extraordinary. Many men I meet at the top position are quite ordinary", she is called out for the statement. Isn't it time men acknowledge the truth. That despite their perceived victimization, it is women who struggle in the workplace.
But gradually, I came to realize that Pongal wasn’t just a Harvest Festival. It was a chance to acknowledge the things you take for granted, to be appreciative of what life has thrown your way, and to hope that you will continue to be that way.
In Gratitude for all I have. In Hope that I will always have enough.
شکر
“What do you think I should paint?”, I asked my younger one.
“An eagle”, he replied.
“But I can’t paint eagles”, I said. “I can only attempt landscapes and flowers.”
“Do an eagle”, he repeated.
“But I can’t.”
He could have told me that if I wasn’t going to take his advice, I shouldn’t have asked him the question. Or he could have sulked and told me to paint whatever I wanted. Instead he insisted that he wanted me to paint an eagle.
“If you only do what you can do, then what is the point?” he reasoned patiently. “You learn only if you try something new.”
“But, I can’t paint an eagle”, I insisted.
“I don’t care. Make an eagle”, he replied with a shrug.
I glared at his retreating back. It was a test and it was a challenge. Was I going to back down? Or was I going to rise up? Had I backed off, he may have judged me or he may not. But could I survive how I would judge myself?
No, I certainly couldn’t draw an eagle, much less paint one. But did that mean I shouldn’t try? What was the worst that could happen? I’d waste a piece of paper and some time. I could certainly live with that.
And so I went to google- how do you draw an eagle, I asked. I followed the first few steps to get a form that looked a bit like one. Then I used a photograph to guide me with the colours. Spilt some paint, and covered it up.
I was 14. My grandfather was after me as usual, berating me for wasting my time reading science fiction when I could be reading the Classics.
"How do you know it's a waste of time unless you read
it?", I asked defiantly.
He conceded the point I was trying to make. We made a pact.
I would read a play by G.B. Shaw and he would read an Asimov
novel.
The deal was that we would each choose the work we wanted to
read.
I picked "Mrs Warren's Profession". In retrospect,
a terrible choice, because I couldn't make head or tail of it.
But something about the characters charmed me and I
continued onto "Arms and the Man", and finished Nine Plays that
Summer.
I was convinced he would hate it. I was preparing my
arguments to defend the genre.
"It has Biblical undertones", he commented when I
asked him how it was going. "It's a little confusing, but he seems a smart
chap."
"It's not Dickens, but it is not bad", he
pronounced when he was done.
The reference to Dickens confused me. I had never claimed
the book was great literature. But I still asked him to explain.
It was the story of the adulterous woman that he was
referring to. Of how the robot grasped some part of 'he who is without sin cast
the first stone'.
His praise of a genre I didn't think he would like, and his
stamp of approval on my reading choice made me internalise the message.
"Go forth and sin no more", was what I would use
in my mind when I forgave people for hurting me.
"Let he who is without sin" remains my philosophy.
I was 14 when my husband died
A man I barely knew.
A man who’s life mine was linked to.
I was forced to
climb
on
his
funeral pyre.
She rescued me.
Allowed me to have my child.
She taught me to read
Made me a teacher.
Stood me on my feet.
Helped me marry the man I loved.
I owed everything to her
I would have given my life for her.
But the guilt remained.
One day, it burst forth-
“Tai, I silently watched
while my sisters
threw stones at you”,
I confessed.
“I know”, she said.
And smiled.
[Savitribai Phule was born on Jan 3, 1897.
An
illiterate girl from a lower caste, married off when still a child, she went on
to become one of modern India's first female teachers, and founded a school for
girls which rivalled those run by the government by young boys.
A
staunch feminist and an anti-caste advocate, she dedicated her life to the upliftment
of women and to the abolition of the caste system. Her protests earned her the active
animosity of Brahmins, who saw her as a threat to the privileges they took for
granted. Yet, most of the battles she fought were against unjust practices that
affected Brahmin women the most. She could have chosen to look away, and only
work to benefit the women of her caste. But she didn’t, because she realized that
women couldn’t be free, unless all women were free.
Long
before the term ‘intersectional feminism’ was coined, Savitribai Phule was one.]